1 |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 07:06:06 -0400 |
2 |
Ionen Wolkens <ionen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:30:20AM +0000, waebbl-gentoo@××××××.net wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 23:11:08 +0100 |
6 |
> > Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > Up for grabs because of inactivity. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > dev-python/pyside2 has several open bugs and a version bump pending. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Needs some real love to tidy it up. |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Best, |
15 |
> > > sam |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Wouldn't it be applicable to put these packages under the umbrella of |
18 |
> > the Gentoo Qt project? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It still need someone to maintain it either way, qt@ is rather small |
21 |
> and Qt6 is likely to use up people's time already. Being m-n at least |
22 |
> make its current state clear (up to qt@ though). |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
I can think of co-maintaining the packages, but it exceeds my resources |
26 |
to being primary maintainer. |
27 |
|
28 |
> > They're developed, published and hosted by the The Qt Company (in |
29 |
> > contrast for example to PyQt5 or QtPy) and are only python |
30 |
> > bindings for the Qt framework, although they're currently distributed |
31 |
> > in a separate tarball and not with the Qt tarball. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> On a side-note I'll be adding PyQt6 to the tree once I can[1], but I |
34 |
> don't use pyside for anything and probably won't be looking at pyside6. |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
I'm slowly working towards shiboken6 / pyside6. Pyside is needed for |
38 |
the Qt6 move of FreeCAD, at it's current state at least. |
39 |
There are discussion on completely moving to pybind11 instead of |
40 |
pyside, but that's not yet decided. So I will probably need pyside6 for |
41 |
the sake of FreeCAD. |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/26504 |