| 1 |
On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:21, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 2 |
> maillog: 01/06/2005-23:25:00(+0900): Jason Stubbs types |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >... |
| 5 |
> > Perhaps, further down the track we'd be able to work out something with |
| 6 |
> > the build farm thingy; check for linkage and warn if things specified in |
| 7 |
> > RDEPEND aren't linked against and build up a whitelist from it... Perhaps |
| 8 |
> > repoman will become smart enough to detect exactly which RDEPENDs are |
| 9 |
> > being defaulted to what and where and then provide a warning and a |
| 10 |
> > resolution... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I don't get it. Linking is not the only reason for a package to RDEPEND |
| 13 |
> on another one. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Or were you talking about something completely different? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Nope. That's why I mentioned a whitelist. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives