| 1 |
tisdag 10 juni 2014 14.22.11 skrev Jeroen Roovers: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:46:56 -0600 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Ryan Hill <rhill@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Yes. But now you've got me worried. We have to build gcc itself with |
| 6 |
> > -fno-stack-protector. Does compiling something with that flag give |
| 7 |
> > an error on hppa? Maybe give 4.8.2-r1 a whirl. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Setting -fstack-protector on HPPA does this: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> warning: -fstack-protector not supported for this target [enabled by |
| 12 |
> default] |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Setting -fno-stack-protector on HPPA causes no problems and is |
| 15 |
> completely silent. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> jer |
| 19 |
The arch that ssp will be enable by default is defined in the ebuild with |
| 20 |
SSP_STABLE or SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
/Magnus |
Archives