Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: J Robert Ray <jrray@g.o>
To: Alan <alan@×××××.org>
Cc: Gentoo User Mailing List <gentoo-user@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] evolution making gnome-vfs degrade?
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 03:31:55
Message-Id: 3E3F3257.4020600@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] evolution making gnome-vfs degrade? by Alan
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Alan wrote:
5 |
6 | Maybe an idea for another feature for portage would be to check for the
7 | SLOT variable and use a different letter instead of D. Maybe "P"arallel
8 | install, or "A"dditional package?
9 | (ccing to gentoo-dev)
10 |
11
12 This seemed like it would be a quick fix but it turns out that the
13 current Portage code doesn't deal with SLOTs very well right now, and
14 making this work will require a lot of effort.
15
16 So consider it something that people want to fix, but it may take some time.
17
18 - - Robert
19
20
21
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows XP)
24 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
25
26 iD8DBQE+PzJWbv6Y11NqSv8RArrUAJ9Yoxpf5lVSlLNmVjVUwSfo5+KZWgCfffiJ
27 SSeaWLMmelyz6ithiJilSBQ=
28 =rnlT
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list