Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:18:08
Message-Id: 1110323854.10828.1.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE groups) and negatives by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Tue, 2005-08-03 at 22:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:35:03 +0100 Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o> wrote:
3 > | On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:21:17PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 > | > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:24:15 +0100 Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o> wrote:
5 > | >
6 > | > Reasons we want to allow negatives:
7 > | > * They are useful in certain situations.
8 > |
9 > | Can you give an example?
10 >
11 > No, but klieber probably can, since he was the main proponent of not
12 > disallowing negatives.
13 >
14 > Having said that, "I can't think of one" is by no means equal to "there
15 > are none". I can't think of any reason why anyone would ever possibly
16 > want to use XML for anything, for example, but I'm sure *someone*
17 > somewhere out there has a legit use for it.
18
19 But when no one on gentoo-dev can give one, that might be a hint that's
20 its not worth taking time to do.
21
22 --
23 Olivier Crête
24 tester@g.o
25 Gentoo Developer
26 x86 Security Liaison

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature