| 1 |
I don't think it makes much sense. The current portage hierarchy is based on the |
| 2 |
are of use of the application, and this is how many users search for the program |
| 3 |
they need. E.g.: If I see gaim package in this category, I expect to find |
| 4 |
gaim-cvs next in the list. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:25:16 +0300 (IDT) |
| 7 |
Tal Peer <coredumb@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Hi, |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev, lu_zero |
| 12 |
> suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs packages |
| 13 |
> there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs ebuilds that |
| 14 |
> most of users don't need/want. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Comments? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Tal |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Let the Force be with us! |
| 28 |
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@g.o> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives