1 |
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:53:27 +0100 |
2 |
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm> wrote: |
3 |
> On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 15:33:14 Fabio Rossi wrote: |
4 |
> > Ok, but at the end we have an exception in the tree |
5 |
> > (/var/lib/gentoo/news/) which is not justified (looking at the |
6 |
> > current discussion). My proposal has arisen after having seen |
7 |
> > the /var/lib/gentoo/news/ hierarchy. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Then it seems way more appropriate and easier to implement to force |
10 |
> Gentoo news to comply to FHS and shot on sight those responsible for |
11 |
> this mess :D |
12 |
|
13 |
Gentoo does not comply with the FHS. It was established a long time ago |
14 |
that FHS is considered silly and any compliance is merely because the |
15 |
FHS people somehow managed to avoid screwing that particular area up. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |