| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 18:01 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jonathan Smith wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The desktop-misc herd (which was sadly neglected until recently) could |
| 4 |
> > benefit from a new virtual. x11-misc/xautolock is a wrapper which locks |
| 5 |
> > the screen via any appropriate program such as xlockmore or xtrlock. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> xscreensaver locks the screen, too, besides its normal screensaver |
| 8 |
> features (like xlockmore). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > This program needs to depend on an xlocker, but we should not lock users |
| 11 |
> > into one specific one. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > See bug 95246 [1] |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I would probably name it virtual/xlocker, but other suggestions are, of |
| 16 |
> > course, welcome. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Thanks |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95246 |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You don't have to setup a virtual for this. In fact, the simpler method |
| 24 |
(especially when dealing with only one package) is to use the || *DEPEND |
| 25 |
syntax. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
RDEPEND="|| ( |
| 28 |
x11-misc/xscreensaver |
| 29 |
x11-misc/xlockmore |
| 30 |
x11-misc/xtrlock )" |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
This would prefer xscreensaver over the others, but any would satisfy |
| 33 |
the dependency. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 37 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 38 |
Games - Developer |
| 39 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives