| 1 |
On 6/20/13 2:16 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Doing test signatures won't cover all failures. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Do you know an example? The only one I'm aware of is when a test |
| 5 |
signature is made very close to the expiration date, and then the real |
| 6 |
signature would be done after it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> IMHO the best thing to do would be to drop CVS keywords and let repoman |
| 9 |
> do normal commits instead of this two-step thing. But some of the devs |
| 10 |
> really prefer to keep them, at least until we migrate to git and have |
| 11 |
> better ways of e.g. checking the file version. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Right, I found that it's used at least for prefix. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm fine with waiting until git migration - looks like that would solve |
| 16 |
it naturally. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paweł |
Archives