| 1 |
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:59:25 +1200 |
| 2 |
Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> There should be nothing stopping a user from running a mixed arch/~arch |
| 6 |
> system. Those problems just point to our dependency information not being |
| 7 |
> recorded correctly. It might be understandable that this info can be |
| 8 |
> incredibly hard to get correct but that doesn't mean it isn't a valid bug. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It's invalid as soon as you bring system-set packages into the mix, which |
| 11 |
falls outside of dependency correctness. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The trouble is knowing if this applies in the situation you're looking into. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
fonts, gcc-porting, we hold our breath, we spin around the world |
| 18 |
toolchain, wxwidgets you and me cling to the outside of the earth |
| 19 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives