Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:13:48
Message-Id: 20080501171334.573eeb50@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages by Mart Raudsepp
1 On Thu, 01 May 2008 19:05:35 +0300
2 Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote:
3 > It still means a rebuild of the binding providing library, which
4 > involves unnecessary recompilation of the (typically) C or C++
5 > library, which in some cases can be a huge time sink - that in the
6 > case that the library in question isn't at that time pulled in (in
7 > that case the package manager can enable it at first merge), but
8 > already installed without the bindings USE flags.
9
10 Not really. For packages that support it, it just means adding a way
11 for that package to be told to do a partial rebuild for the addition of
12 a use flag.
13
14 But that discussion can come after Portage gets use dependencies...
15 Which, as I understand it, won't be for at least another eighteen months
16 because three more people have just asked for them.
17
18 --
19 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>