1 |
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 16:11 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
2 |
> eselect is a known interface for most (all?) slotted packages. |
3 |
> Configuration management tools expect that the appropriate module will |
4 |
> be pulled in once you install a slotable package. |
5 |
|
6 |
Could you back your claims with specific numbers? How many packages |
7 |
that do not strictly require eselect to operate are actually pulling |
8 |
it in? |
9 |
|
10 |
I don't see a single shell pulling in app-eselect/eselect-sh. |
11 |
|
12 |
sys-devel/binutils and sys-devel/gcc are probably the most common |
13 |
examples of packages not using eselect (except for one failed attempt). |
14 |
|
15 |
> You are now forcing everyone to either migrate to a new system (manage |
16 |
> python-exec.conf directly) or ensure they update their world file and |
17 |
> manually ensure that eselect-python is still installed which will make |
18 |
> Python special. |
19 |
|
20 |
Is it really that bad to install the tools you actually use instead of |
21 |
forcing 'one size fits all' approach? |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |