1 |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:29:37AM -0800, M. Edward Borasky wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:17 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote: |
3 |
> > One thing I have always noticed about gentoo is that it is lacking in |
4 |
> > the server department, for whatever reason. I was wondering if there |
5 |
> > are any plans to remedy this, I have thought about a few possible |
6 |
> > ideas. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > 1) add an emerge server-system class, this class would contain apps |
9 |
> > that may not be as new, but they would be known to be stable, and work |
10 |
> > well with everything. THe last thing a server admin needs is to be |
11 |
> > debugging which package in an emerge -aDuv world is messing up. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > 2) make better use of glsa-check, maybe an addon that parses that |
14 |
> > output and automatically does upgrades known not to break anything. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > 3) I dunno.... what do you think? |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Is this a possibilty//has it been talked about at all? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I don't think Gentoo is "lacking in the server department" at all. It |
21 |
> hasn't been deployed much in the server marketplace because of the |
22 |
> overwhelming market share position of Red Hat, and to a lesser extent |
23 |
> Suse and Mandrake. In other words, this isn't a technical issue, it's a |
24 |
> marketing issue. Maybe when there are Gentoo Certified Engineers, and a |
25 |
> corporate-style accountability, Gentoo will at least get some attention. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Then again, I'm not sure that a "non-profit" organization like the |
28 |
> Gentoo Foundation can "legitimately" compete with Red Hat or Novell. |
29 |
|
30 |
The decision for an OS is very often political, not technical. |
31 |
|
32 |
We used Redhat (non ES) very heavyly since it was the most spread |
33 |
linux system. It was hard enough to get some official support from |
34 |
the hardware companies because they tended to say "Use a real OS instead of |
35 |
this, then you won't have this problem". |
36 |
|
37 |
Times have changed, now many hardware companies support linux. |
38 |
Now, as the Redhat and SUSE has Enterprise versions they tend to say |
39 |
"use the enterprise versions". HP is a bit different, as they support |
40 |
debian now. |
41 |
|
42 |
Anyway I don't know any hardware company supporting Gentoo. |
43 |
|
44 |
I don't mean support like "I am too dumb installing gentoo" or |
45 |
"help me I can't find my network properties". I need some kind |
46 |
of guarantie that things will work with this or that software. |
47 |
|
48 |
----- |
49 |
|
50 |
Beside that I see some a technical reason: |
51 |
|
52 |
Heterogenous environments |
53 |
|
54 |
First of all, if a server is heavy loaded, it tend not to compile |
55 |
anything there. Gentoo supports binary packages when they are created |
56 |
as part of the emerge process, a good thing. |
57 |
|
58 |
But what if you have very different machines ? compile everything |
59 |
with i386 settings? Different build flags would mean differnent build |
60 |
machines or different build runs |
61 |
|
62 |
regards klaus |
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |