1 |
Kent Fredric posted on Sat, 28 May 2016 17:07:56 +1200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Which is a rather bad combination of pressures. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Hence, eblits as they currently exist are experts-only and a big |
6 |
> danger ground for QA violations *to occur within*, even under the |
7 |
> presumption that they're not inherently a QA violation in themselves. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thanks. You well explained the details of /why/ eblits are experts-only, |
10 |
that I deliberately fuzzed over in my first thread reply. Now I |
11 |
understand them better myself. =:^) |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
15 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
16 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |