| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:43:28PM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote: |
| 3 |
> > LDFLAGS? Assuming you meant ASFLAGS, this doesn't affect C files, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> correct |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as |
| 8 |
> > patches which add .note.GNU-stack would, right? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> no |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> you were supposed to send that patch upstream, i guess you didnt huh |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In my first message I explained the reason for asking about these kinds |
| 15 |
of patches: because your reason against them -- that they can't be sent |
| 16 |
upstream -- didn't apply. So I guess this situation would be that I did |
| 17 |
send a patch upstream, but it simply wasn't accepted yet. This can |
| 18 |
happen with any patch, even those of your preferred kind. |
Archives