Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Phil Richards <news@××××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kde 3.2 beta2
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:56:10
Message-Id: 20040728175552.A88B87C7FE@derisoft.derived-software.demon.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] kde 3.2 beta2 by Norberto Bensa
1 On 2004-07-28, Norberto Bensa <norberto+gentoo-dev@×××××××××.cx> wrote:
2 > Caleb Tennis wrote:
3 > > I didn't intend for it to be package.mask'd - it's quite stable, we want to
4 > I disagree.
5 > I use kde 3.3_beta2, and no, it's not stable enough for daily usage.
6
7 Isn't that what using ~x86 you might expect? If there is
8 a view that the beta is generally ok (and it clearly doesn't
9 cause problems for everybody) then ~x86 seems reasonable to get
10 the ebuilds sorted out ready for "full" release of 3.3.
11
12 > I'm using gcc 3.4.1; maybe that's the cause... :-?
13
14 Erm, yes, well. Using a (masked) compiler with a completely rewritten
15 C++ frontend might *just* have a minor impact on a system written
16 entirely in C++ :-)
17
18 phil
19 --
20 change name before "@" to "phil" for email
21
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] kde 3.2 beta2 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: kde 3.2 beta2 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] kde 3.2 beta2 Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>