1 |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:30 PM, W. Trevor King <wking@×××××××.us> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:58:32PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
3 |
>> https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I'm not a dev, and I haven't really been following this thread, but |
6 |
> all the other organization summaries start out with something like |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Organization X is … |
9 |
> |
10 |
> not |
11 |
> |
12 |
> In order to sustain the current quality … |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Perhaps it would be worth rewriting to start with |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The Gentoo Foundation is … |
17 |
|
18 |
Yeah, that was my thought as well. The text was lifted from our |
19 |
charter, which was apparently written from a problem/solution |
20 |
standpoint rather than something that would be less time-bound. It |
21 |
doesn't really make sense having the organization description written |
22 |
as if it describes something that doesn't yet exist. |
23 |
|
24 |
Gleaning from the same document, but in a more positive way, how about: |
25 |
|
26 |
The Gentoo Foundation protects the intellectual property of the Gentoo |
27 |
community, supports Gentoo Development, and oversees adherence to the |
28 |
Gentoo social contract. It oversees all legal aspects of the Gentoo |
29 |
community, so that developers are free to advance the technical goals |
30 |
of Gentoo. |
31 |
|
32 |
The Gentoo Foundation keeps four pillars in mind: |
33 |
1. Gentoo provides choices |
34 |
2. Gentoo is open |
35 |
3. Gentoo lives for the community, by the community |
36 |
4. Gentoo is independent |
37 |
|
38 |
Rich |