1 |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:58, Matthew Summers |
2 |
<quantumsummers@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> __Everyone__ is already using an initramfs, therefore there are no |
4 |
> initramfs-less systems anymore (it may just be empty). |
5 |
|
6 |
I suggest that you take a look at CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD. |
7 |
|
8 |
> Why is an in-kernel initramfs so bad anyway? I am baffled. Its quite |
9 |
> nice to have a minimal recovery env in case mounting fails, etc, etc, |
10 |
> etc. |
11 |
|
12 |
There is nothing bad about initramfs. I think that you are misreading |
13 |
the arguments above. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Maxim Kammerer |
17 |
Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute) |