| 1 |
Am 27. Oct 2014, 12:07 schrieb "M. Ziebell" <ziebell_marco@××××××.de>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Does clang compile glibc already? |
| 4 |
> At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because |
| 5 |
> of:[1] |
| 6 |
> - nested functions |
| 7 |
> - VLAIS |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> How did you avoid that problem? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Even without this issues there remains the fact that glibc is quite |
| 12 |
closely coupled to gcc's support libraries (e.g. |
| 13 |
$ grep "dlopen.*gcc_" **/*.c, or pthread's usage of support |
| 14 |
libraries...). And this is something that won't change anytime |
| 15 |
soon. After all, glibc is part of the GNU eco system and as such it is |
| 16 |
perfectly valid to depend on respective compiler. |
Archives