| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb: |
| 5 |
> As one can easily see: While the fetch time for co and lw-co are more or |
| 6 |
> less equal, the export time is not. As one can say, that each package is |
| 7 |
> at least exported as often as updated (if not more often), this makes |
| 8 |
> the lw co operation more or less a no-no. (Waiting one minute to get a |
| 9 |
> snapshot of a medium-sized project? ... ehm - NO) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
One note - just saw the following for the bzr-1.13_rc1 release notes: |
| 12 |
"Lightweight Checkouts and Stacked Branches should both be much faster |
| 13 |
over remote connections. Building the working tree now batches up |
| 14 |
requests into approx 5MB requests, rather than a separate request for |
| 15 |
each file. (John Arbash Meinel)" |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So perhaps it is improved for this new release. Have to retest soon. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(I also wonder, why the hell the export of the lw-co takes so long ... |
| 20 |
it more or less just needs to copy the files... I cannot see the need to |
| 21 |
fetch each file again from the remote repo. Perhaps this is worth a |
| 22 |
bzr-bug.) |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkm3C9MACgkQ4UOg/zhYFuDAuwCePrNj2rQ4au99QziYZl7qpe9a |
| 28 |
PFYAn2ZuRqp3vpNLUwcASN6wk8NaqL/s |
| 29 |
=Li4s |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives