| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>I think both our points are that there is a middle ground between |
| 5 |
>>screwing the user outright and holding their hand. If you want to |
| 6 |
>>trumpet the change on forums, on www, on -announce, get the message out |
| 7 |
>>there; then I'd be more for a change like that. The problem is last |
| 8 |
>>time it was dead silent; oh it's in the upgrade guide, great; we already |
| 9 |
>>know that not everyone reads it. At that point you are just leaving the |
| 10 |
>> pit for them to walk into. IMHO, thats irresponsible of Gentoo as a |
| 11 |
>>whole. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yet another reason to finish up GLEP 42.. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Actually I was thinking of implementing glep 42 as a mini-project for |
| 18 |
treecleaners, but I need to finish SoC first. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives