Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sean Jensen_Grey <seanj@×××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] is portage not so fresh?
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:08:24
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.21.0102251257280.25492-100000@grace.speakeasy.org
1 Consider me a tester. I like the whole gestalt of gentoo. Your distro is doing
2 a lot of things right. I want to help. And I want to use.
3
4 I want a light fast distro that I can use for server deployment without a lot of
5 hassles. And getoo looks like it is going there.
6
7 I tried to use ebuild to get a portage back on my system.
8
9 portage > ebuild portage-1.4-r15.ebuild merge
10 /usr/bin/ebuild: import-settings: command not found
11 /usr/bin/ebuild: import-configsettings: command not found
12 Traceback (most recent call last):
13 File "/usr/sbin/pkgname", line 3, in ?
14 import portage
15 File "/usr/lib/python2.0/portage.py", line 1757, in ?
16 File "/usr/lib/python2.0/portage.py", line 301, in getsetting
17 File "/usr/lib/python2.0/portage.py", line 388, in getconfig
18 IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/make.defaults'
19 !!! packagename is not a valid package name. Exiting.
20
21 is there a tar.gz I can use get my system back into a KGS (known good state) ?
22
23 I don't really know the directory hierarchy that well.
24
25 Sean.