1 |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
2 |
> Roy Bamford wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> So when you build a dud kernel and flash your BIOS with it, and we |
5 |
>> all build the odd dud, your motherboard is bricked. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Any firmware modification has potential to brick, and shouldn't be |
8 |
> done unless you are comfortable with the modification, or with |
9 |
> solving a brick problem. :) |
10 |
|
11 |
So, why are we still going back and forth about this? If people want |
12 |
to work on coreboot they can do so (I'm sure they have a list). If |
13 |
people want to fork coreboot or redo it from scrach they can do so and |
14 |
start their own list. |
15 |
|
16 |
When it is shiny and perfect and has a following of hundreds of linux |
17 |
users we can always discuss whether we recommend using it in the |
18 |
handbook on -dev then. Otherwise it seems about as on-topic as |
19 |
debating whether grub or systemd or openrc should have feature A/B/C - |
20 |
we're a DISTRO - we integrate and ship what upstream gives us... |
21 |
|
22 |
Rich |