| 1 |
On 28-12-2019 22:27:02 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:09:33 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > How can we improve this? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Every time this kind of issue comes up, I can't help feeling we need |
| 8 |
> some sort of tool more advanced than what we currently have. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Something that maintains persistence of keyword demands similar to how |
| 11 |
> the current bot does, but more ... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Its the sort of thing I get tempted to implement myself, but get too |
| 14 |
> horrified about the prospect of working with portage internals to do it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hmmm, interested to hear what kind of things you're thinking about here. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I feel it would help if we would have the ability to at least |
| 19 |
compile/test ebuilds automatically. Not sure how helpful qemu could be |
| 20 |
there, but I know things like compiling for things like arm (RPi) works |
| 21 |
reasonably well. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Fabian |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives