| 1 |
Dnia 2013-08-01, o godz. 23:03:11 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01/08/13 19:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 5 |
> > El jue, 01-08-2013 a las 18:11 +0200, Luca Barbato escribió: |
| 6 |
> >> On 01/08/13 17:36, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> So esystemd and ekmod now? |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> You know my stance on systemd, for me it is a jumble of bad and |
| 10 |
> >> interesting ideas not so soundly implemented, I do not have much time or |
| 11 |
> >> will to play with that thing. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> kmod on the other hand had a pressing issue and getting it fixed-ish |
| 14 |
> >> took about an evening while having Federico see around it. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> lu |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > But, what are the advantages of putting a lot of effort in keeping |
| 20 |
> > static libs for udev? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> A lot of effort means not using random-clashing-names, not keeping |
| 23 |
> functions around just because. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
That would be a lot of effort if upstream doesn't accept it and we end |
| 26 |
up patching it all the way... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives