Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:21:42
Message-Id: 20080821173713.GA29630@spoc.mpa.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2? by Arun Raghavan
1 On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:31:17PM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
6 > [...]
7 > > The benefit is that it's a logically separate action, and will avoid
8 > > all the silliness of people repeatedly changing their minds about
9 > > which phase should do the eautoreconf calls and so on.
10 >
11 > a) Is this really an issue for maintainers?
12 As someone who has worked with exheres, I very much want this phase for
13 EAPI 2. It makes things simpler and more logical. Why should patching be
14 done in _unpack? It shouldn't, and that's a reason why _prepare should
15 be added.
16 > b) Does it really matter?
17 To me, yes