Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/term?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:59:27
Message-Id: 4231F7B1.6080408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/term? by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > On Friday 11 March 2005 01:45 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
6 >
7 >>Basic idea is creating a virtual/term for terminal emulators, so things
8 >>that "require" one can depend on it. The only thing I'm aware of that
9 >>would use this capability is X, so I'm wondering whether anyone else
10 >>would use it.
11 >
12 >
13 > i dont think anything else could possibly benefit from such a virtual ... why
14 > not just remove the xterm DEPEND completely and be done with it ?
15
16 Because as I said in the bug, it's expected to be part of an installed X
17 implementation. If upstream stops, so will I.
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
20
21 iD8DBQFCMfexXVaO67S1rtsRAn/VAJ9+p3+obYFBJHmhH8GNKHLQhhJgjACguVim
22 pZtWy6q7nXrbMSUkVEdsfqY=
23 =qWs2
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/term? Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>