Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:19:11
Message-Id: 1120986972.6108.148.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps by Martin Schlemmer
1 On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 12:58 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > Stupid question .. why does webapps.eclass have SLOT=${PVR} ?
3
4 If you're running a hosting server, and have many customers using the
5 same app, it may not be practical to bump them all at the same time.
6
7 * They may have different busy periods during the day, making it
8 impossible to schedule a common downtime.
9 * Many upgrades require manual steps - it's less disruptive to upgrade
10 each installation one at a time.
11 * Different customers may want or need to run different versions of the
12 same app. If a customer is happy with what they have, they may not wish
13 to upgrade.
14
15 > This
16 > basically means that even a bump from foo-webapp-1.0-r1 to
17 > foo-webapp-1.0-r2 will not unmerge foo-webapp-1.0-r1 ...
18
19 If you don't have USE=vhosts set, then the eclass will automatically
20 unmerge the older version. If you have USE=vhosts set, then you're
21 telling Portage that you need the flexibility of running webapp-config
22 manually.
23
24 Best regards,
25 Stu
26
27
28 --
29 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
30 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
31 http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
32
33 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
34 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
35 --

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature