Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits] | ||
| Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:09:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20150313210929.603006d6@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits] by Jason Zaman |
||
| 1 | > From: Ian Delaney <idella4@g.o> |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > This single change will make my commits of last 2 years a violation |
| 4 | > of policy, in a retrograde manner ofcourse. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | You'll have to fix those ebuilds. The policy was already in place |
| 7 | before[1] you were around[2]. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > The flaw here is that it is using a black and white and reductionist |
| 10 | > approach. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | No, the flaw is that you directly use functions from an eclass that you |
| 13 | are not inheriting. That you have been doing it for two years doesn't |
| 14 | change anything. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | jer |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | [1] |
| 21 | http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/95e9f3e489cb84949c4bc5e7399e0ddf |
| 22 | [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits] | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |