Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:59:31
Message-Id: 200703301654.17742.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Friday 30 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
3 > > i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it
4 > > comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo.
5 >
6 > It's relevant in that people have to work with the developers of the
7 > package manager. Unlike most other things in the portage tree, the
8 > package manager ties very closely to the very definition of the
9 > distribution itself. Hence, if people are unable to get along, then by
10 > adopting a package manager like that, you inherently adopt the
11 > developers of that package manager and all the personnel issues that
12 > accompany it.
13 >
14 > Ideally, however, I agree with you that it should be based on technical
15 > merits. The reality is that there are people involved. And people
16 > always complicate things.
17
18 thanks seemant, preciously how i'd have put it if i could :)
19 -mike