1 |
On Friday 30 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote: |
3 |
> > i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it |
4 |
> > comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> It's relevant in that people have to work with the developers of the |
7 |
> package manager. Unlike most other things in the portage tree, the |
8 |
> package manager ties very closely to the very definition of the |
9 |
> distribution itself. Hence, if people are unable to get along, then by |
10 |
> adopting a package manager like that, you inherently adopt the |
11 |
> developers of that package manager and all the personnel issues that |
12 |
> accompany it. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Ideally, however, I agree with you that it should be based on technical |
15 |
> merits. The reality is that there are people involved. And people |
16 |
> always complicate things. |
17 |
|
18 |
thanks seemant, preciously how i'd have put it if i could :) |
19 |
-mike |