| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
OK - I see the ombudsman as being valuable to our project. However, since the |
| 5 |
persons acting as an ombudsman do not truly have authority for resolving the |
| 6 |
issue @ hand and are just working as a mediator (not arbiter) to impartially |
| 7 |
investigate and potentially by wisdom settle disputes - I suggest we append |
| 8 |
the glep to state issues that cannot be resolved by using an ombudsman be |
| 9 |
lifted to the tlps for direction on how to proceed. Then we as tlps can make |
| 10 |
a decision. While I do not see this as a frequent happening (becoming some |
| 11 |
burden to the tlps), ultimately someone has to be accountable and make a |
| 12 |
decision when something cannot be handled by the ombudsman for whatever |
| 13 |
sundry reason. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Jay |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
On Sunday 13 July 2003 06:48 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 18 |
> Okay, It's been about a week since I sent my Ombudsman GLEP out for |
| 19 |
> comments, so it's time to summarize the comments so far. The original |
| 20 |
> GLEP may be found at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep. So far there |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQE/EgCce5xY3v0FhjgRAti9AJ4z3wd5GEBcz6Se90wCw+kDeIXfQwCfbiIf |
| 25 |
vULqL1+mijrqPBtvMXBYQ8E= |
| 26 |
=k675 |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives