1 |
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 13:11, Stefan Sperling wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
> > -gtk +gtk2 is a no-op. |
4 |
> why? |
5 |
As Brian said, gtk2 depends on gtk. |
6 |
Just as a practical example, take ethereal, which could be built without gui |
7 |
support, just using tethereal. |
8 |
If you build it with -gtk +gtk2, it will build tethereal, not ethereal. I |
9 |
submitted some time ago a patch to make this a more logical behaviour, but I |
10 |
needed to change it to suit the same behaviour of other packages. See bug |
11 |
#81055. |
12 |
|
13 |
Take also amule which you can find on bugzilla as an example, which can be |
14 |
built without gtk support, and on which gtk2 support depends on gtk. |
15 |
|
16 |
Or wxGTK in which +wxnogtk flag is used to disable gtk1 support (there's gtk2 |
17 |
flag but no gtk flag). |
18 |
|
19 |
I still think this is illogical, but I can't do much on this. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
23 |
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/ |