Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:33:29
Message-Id: 20140114223312.GA3337@laptop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Michael Orlitzky
1 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:57:30PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 01/14/2014 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > >
4 > > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2].
5 >
6 > [ ] Yup
7 > [X] Nope
8
9 The reverse of this would be to let maintainers stabilize on all arch's
10 after 90 days, then they are allowed to remove all but the latest stable
11 version. This isn't good though because maintainers would be stabilizing
12 packages on arch's where they can't test.
13
14 The stable tree is significantly behind because the arch teams are so
15 short staffed, and this prooposal is an attempt to fix that.
16
17 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>