| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 6 |
>> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 |
| 8 |
>> > "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>> > |
| 10 |
>> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: |
| 11 |
>> >> > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count |
| 12 |
>> >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net |
| 13 |
>> >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get |
| 14 |
>> >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net |
| 15 |
>> >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get |
| 16 |
>> >> > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, |
| 17 |
>> >> > > you'll get the closest mirror for downloading. |
| 18 |
>> >> > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual |
| 19 |
>> >> > backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, |
| 20 |
>> >> > what about this pseudo-mirrors already present in |
| 21 |
>> >> > thirdpartymirrors ? |
| 22 |
>> >> I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them |
| 23 |
>> >> as such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries |
| 24 |
>> >> added (eg adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. |
| 25 |
>> >> Should have just the bouncer). |
| 26 |
>> > |
| 27 |
>> > It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror |
| 28 |
>> > entries, which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// |
| 29 |
>> > entries but won't be used for downloads. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> Yep, we could put that in it too: |
| 32 |
>> github http://github.com/downloads/ |
| 33 |
>> https://github.com/downloads/ |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Per spec, portage can choose a random mirror of the list. If we put |
| 36 |
> entries like that, these two will be equally possible as the preferred |
| 37 |
> cloud. URL -- while they redirect one to another. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> We might decide on some common syntax like preceding all extra entries |
| 40 |
> with '-' but I don't want to be the one deciding here. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
I checked, and current portage code already handle entries starting |
| 43 |
with a - gracefully thanks to stack_dictlist (removing them from the |
| 44 |
list of mirrors). |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Corentin Chary |
| 48 |
http://xf.iksaif.net |
Archives