| 1 |
On 10/03/2010 01:53 PM, David Leverton wrote: |
| 2 |
> While I do agree that the underlying problem we're trying to solve is |
| 3 |
> worth solving, I do have a couple of small concerns about how it's |
| 4 |
> being done. The first is that it seems people are judging whether a |
| 5 |
> particular .la file is "needed" by checking whether anything currently |
| 6 |
> in the tree needs it, but this doesn't take into account anything that |
| 7 |
> /isn't/ in the tree yet. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think the simpler solution is that if it needs .la, before reaching |
| 10 |
the tree it has to be fixed... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
lu |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Luca Barbato |
| 17 |
Gentoo/linux |
| 18 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives