From: | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior | ||
Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:48:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 20061103184511.34703e90@blashyrk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior by Mike Frysinger |
1 | On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:29:45 -0500 |
2 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > so to recap, the fix here changes it back to the historically |
5 | > documented behavior that the implicit RDEPEND happens in ebuilds |
6 | > regardless of what eclasses do |
7 | |
8 | Do it please. The current behaviour is retarded however you look at it. |
9 | -- |
10 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |