Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: AGottinger@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:16:16
Message-Id: 3B38BF23.C14D1492@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] xfree86 4.1.0 ebuild by tadpol@tadpol.org
1 tadpol@××××××.org wrote:
2 >
3 > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0000, Joe Bormolini wrote:
4 > > Someone came into #gentoo last night saying when trying to merge xfree86
5 > > 4.1.0, somehow the flag -march=1 got passed to gcc instead of
6 > > -march=pentiumpro. Last night I went to build 4.1.0 and had the same
7 > > problem. I cannot for the life of me figure out why -march=pentiumpro turns
8 > > into march=1. The person on irc also mentioned that changing it to pentium
9 > > allowed it to build.
10 >
11 > I'm seeing this as well in 4.0.3. from what I can tell, *any* thing you
12 > try to make that uses Imake (and xmkmf) has this problem. (try to build
13 > media-gfx/xfig for example. You get the same errors.)
14 >
15
16 Hrm, thats really bad.
17
18 some apps worked after I changed pnetiumpro to i686 but we must find the
19 cause for this problem.
20 unfortunately the rc5 packages have this problem too.
21 Can the string2.h fix in glibc cuase such a problem?
22 I think this is the only big difference between the last two build
23 snapshots.
24
25 bye achim~
26
27 > --
28 > Michael Tilstra tadpol@××××××.org
29 > The sum of the intelligence on a planet is a constant; the population is
30 > growing.
31 >
32 > _______________________________________________
33 > gentoo-dev mailing list
34 > gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
35 > http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev