| 1 |
Hi Aaron, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> writes: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I am not too familair with prefix other than the purpose of it (e.g. I |
| 6 |
> have never built it), but is there a better naming standard for the |
| 7 |
> profiles? I understand the need to distinguish between the kernel and |
| 8 |
> glibc versions. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Is there a standard I am missing for profile names? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
From PMS, there is no words on profile naming. But I think adopting |
| 13 |
naming of category [A-Za-z0-9+_.-] will not be too wrong: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-170003.1.1 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Could there be a wiki explaining a prefix profile versioning that |
| 18 |
> correlates to the glibc and kernel versions? Or is the intent to keep |
| 19 |
> it simple and easily identifiable from within the PM? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
A wiki page would be a good idea for detailed explanations. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Not a big deal, but just my thoughts. Thanks for your work on prefix |
| 24 |
> and I am sure many will benefit from the new profiles :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks for inputs! |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Yours, |
| 29 |
Benda |
Archives