1 |
Peter wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:42:03 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hi, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I have founded a new Gentoo Project for the Gentoo User Overlay. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> The intention is to give contributors a single place to put their ebuilds - |
10 |
>> a place where they can be downloaded, updated and be moved to portage more |
11 |
>> easily than through bugzilla. It is also a good place for users who would |
12 |
>> like to become developers to learn how to commit and how to not break the |
13 |
>> tree. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> I think this answers an important shortcoming of the bugzilla approach: |
17 |
> vis, some bugs will never make it to the tree -- for any number of |
18 |
> reasons. Take, for example, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103354, |
19 |
> which has an enhancement request for what is now called beyond-sources. A |
20 |
> amalgamation of the arch, ck, tiger, nitro, and suspend2 sources. While on |
21 |
> the kernel, IRC, I enquired about it, since I had just updated an ebuild |
22 |
> for it, and was told unequivocally that there was no interest on the |
23 |
> kernel team's part for adding this source tree to sys-kernel. Not maybe, |
24 |
> not let's have a look at it, not come back in a month after testing. Just |
25 |
> NO. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> And, I'm fine with that. That's their job -- to protect the quality of |
28 |
> their project, and to keep things relatively safe and manageable. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Nonetheless, the bug is active, with a good number of people subscribing |
31 |
> to it and contributing to it. The sunshine overlay would be an ideal place |
32 |
> to store a kernel source tree or any project which would never find a home |
33 |
> in portage. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
If the ebuild will never find a home in portage, then it shouldn't be |
37 |
officially supported. |
38 |
What you are proposing is like to setup a parallel portage tree. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |