1 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Is this something worth pinching for a future EAPI? If we go with the |
4 |
> postfix [] form for ranged deps, it'd translate into: |
5 |
> LICENSE="=GPL-2" (or equivalently, LICENSE="GPL[=2]") |
6 |
> LICENSE="|| ( GPL[>=2] BSD )" (or equivalently, ">=GPL-2") |
7 |
> LICENSE="|| ( LGPL[>=2&<3] Eclipse )" |
8 |
|
9 |
This is hardly readable, in my eyes at least but I am older than 25 |
10 |
now. I think it is not really necessary (overkill), but I haven't |
11 |
heard anything from other people yet. |
12 |
|
13 |
> One thing that would need to be decided: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> LICENSE="GPL-2" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Would that require an = prefix? To simplify things, we could say that |
18 |
> *only* the postfix [] form counts for licenses... |
19 |
|
20 |
To have backwards compatability...yes. |
21 |
|
22 |
V-Li |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
26 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
27 |
|
28 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |