| 1 |
On 16/03/13 14:39, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm trying to find a reason to keep this line... |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", GROUP="usb" |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> in /lib/udev/rules.d/40-gentoo.rules we have inherited from older udev, |
| 7 |
> going back some time now |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> # find /dev -group usb -exec ls -l {} + |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> results nothing on every system tested |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> and the original /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules from |
| 14 |
> udev-197/198 has: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", MODE="0664" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> which seems to be what we want? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I can remember one or two ebuilds making use of group usb, but they have |
| 21 |
> their own udev rules that makes them to do that, and are not dependant |
| 22 |
> on these rules |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Got it. Unless you have something else totally different to list here, |
| 27 |
nevermind. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 0 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/001/001 |
| 30 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 1 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/001/002 |
| 31 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 2 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/001/003 |
| 32 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 128 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/002/001 |
| 33 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 129 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/002/002 |
| 34 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 130 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/002/003 |
| 35 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 132 Mar 14 12:15 ./bus/usb/002/005 |
| 36 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 256 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/003/001 |
| 37 |
crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 384 Mar 14 14:14 ./bus/usb/004/001 |
Archives