Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ?
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:21:24
Message-Id: 49A01BEC.8080700@gmail.com
1 Hi,
2
3 I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
4 #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
5 http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
6 (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
7 GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as
8 another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case,
9 should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be
10 "templatized" like most licenses ?
11
12 Thanks,
13 Mounir

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>