Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/liboobs
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 02:29:42
Message-Id: de7b05280aafe7c4aa6407f0a25305f26c185039.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/liboobs by Peter Stuge
1 On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 22:23 +0000, Peter Stuge wrote:
2 > Jimi Huotari wrote:
3 > > # Jimi Huotari <chiitoo@g.o> (2020-08-04)
4 > > # No consumers since 2015, and no known stand-alone use.
5 > > # Removal in 30 days.
6 > > dev-libs/liboobs
7 >
8 > Wut - isn't that a really poor reason to remove from the tree? :\
9 >
10 > Why not just keep it unless there is an actual technical problem?
11 > (Security, maintainability, etc.) If there is, then please mention it.
12 >
13
14 Yes, having 1953 unmaintained packages is great PR for Gentoo. Wait, it
15 will be 1954 now.
16
17 --
18 Best regards,
19 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature