1 |
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:10:45 +0200 |
2 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Some days ago I included an ebuild for subversion-0.20.1 . It is still |
5 |
> masked as the ebuild is complicated. So if interested people could |
6 |
> check whether it builds for them, please post a reply on the status. |
7 |
> If it proves that the ebuild works, I'll put subversion in unstable |
8 |
> (It depends on apache2 so it will not go into stable before apache2) |
9 |
|
10 |
Why does it install BerkleyDB 4 rather that depending on it? |
11 |
|
12 |
I already have version 4 installed using the ebuild for it since I am |
13 |
doing some development work against it (why work do a new project |
14 |
against an earlier version?) so having it as part of subversion as well |
15 |
seems wrong. |
16 |
-- |
17 |
Mark Gordon |
18 |
Paid to be a Geek & a Senior Software Developer |
19 |
Currently looking for a new job commutable from Slough, Berks, U.K. |
20 |
Although my email address says spamtrap, it is real and I read it. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |