Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | MooktaKiNG <Mooktakim@×××××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Readme files for portage (was: A nice idea to improve portage) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:10:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030611061056.B1052@datanode.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Readme files for portage (was: A nice idea to improve portage) by MooktaKiNG |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:37:02AM +0100, MooktaKiNG wrote: |
| 2 | > Another good reason to have a README is becuase sometimes people |
| 3 | > want to know more about a program. Without having to install it. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > If they can learn about the program before they install. They are |
| 6 | > more aware of how hard/easy the installtion is. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I thought that was one of the reasons the source URL shows up in a |
| 9 | search. It's how I've always checked to see what a package does. README |
| 10 | files, imo, are great in theory but put additional maintenance strain on |
| 11 | a dev. Just my two euros, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Mike |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Readme files for portage (was: A nice idea to improve portage) | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Readme files for portage (was: A nice idea to improve portage) | "D. Tuinstra" <tuinstra@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Readme files for portage (was: A nice idea to improve portage) | MooktaKiNG <Mooktakim@×××××××.com> |