| 1 |
On 10-08-2017 16:09:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> ...which probably makes sense if you treat is as a continuation of mail- |
| 3 |
> client/mutt package. However, since we package it separately, using |
| 4 |
> the same name is going to create more confusion than renaming it to |
| 5 |
> match the package name. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If I install 'dev-foo/foobar', I usually expect to find the program name |
| 8 |
> 'foobar', not just 'bar'. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think we're clear now that the eselect idea wasn't the proper way |
| 11 |
forward. Nicholas and I are discussing off-list what the next approach |
| 12 |
will be, given the suggestions you and others have done in this thread. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
Fabian |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 20 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives