From: | Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | ||
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:17:47 | ||
Message-Id: | CAD6zcDwAOid_cosJx5=bwkFc4A5iVavowxgu+UAoYMFKWwaDpw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default by Fabio Erculiani |
1 | 2013/1/23 Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> |
2 | |
3 | > I think that the problem is that it is trying to be smart when it's |
4 | > not really possible (unless you want to cover all the corner cases, |
5 | > which is a pain). |
6 | > |
7 | > |
8 | > Hum, but if we could not be smart enough we can at least try to be very |
9 | annoying. |
10 | what about a delay of some seconds, exactly like `emerge -C portage` or |
11 | something very similar? |
12 | Trying to cover the corner cases but without pretend to be omniscent? |