From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass | ||
Date: | Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:37:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 20080213063708.69a49b3a@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass by "Petteri Räty" |
1 | On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:44:22 +0200 |
2 | Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running |
4 | > eautoreconf? |
5 | |
6 | Isn't base.eclass considered pretty much dead and to be avoided? It's a |
7 | throwback to how eclasses were originally going to work, and it doesn't |
8 | correspond nicely to ebuild default functions. |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |