| 1 |
My apologies for not being a responsible netzin and doing a quick search |
| 2 |
in the mailing list. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Thanks for the heads up though |
| 5 |
Richard Reich |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 14:16, Spider wrote: |
| 8 |
> begin quote |
| 9 |
> On 17 Jun 2002 13:04:47 -0400 |
| 10 |
> Richard Reich <rreich@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Here is the error, is there anything I can do to fix this? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Thanks |
| 15 |
> > Richard Reich |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> 1) Read ChangeLog. Its been a documented fact that Sawfish snapshots |
| 18 |
> are broken and fail to compile for quite some time now. |
| 19 |
> 2) http://bugs.gentoo.org/ Has at least two exactly the same entries. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> 3) its also been in the forums. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> 4) its been in my private mails too. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> 5) file bugs upstream or Fix it. the only reason its still there, is |
| 26 |
> because the noise of it being broken is less than the noise I recieved |
| 27 |
> when I stubbornly declined to include it because it was just that... |
| 28 |
> broken. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Sorry to appear irritated, but I am, I've been facing broken snapshots |
| 31 |
> since april, and so far I've gotten no solid documentation on what makes |
| 32 |
> it build, and quite some pointers that "but they have it". |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Yours, |
| 36 |
> Irritable Maintainer. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> aka. Spider |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> -- |
| 44 |
> begin .signature |
| 45 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 46 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 47 |
> end |
Archives