Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Seifert <soap@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:36:47
Message-Id: 06ee43edda907d3ebe7d0178967c05bd86b6b770.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies by Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
1 On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
2 > On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 > > > > > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > > > --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
6 > > > > +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
7 > > > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
8 > > > > local res=
9 > > > > for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
10 > > > > has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
11 > > > > - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
12 > > > > ntation}?,"
13 > > > > + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
14 > > > > ntation}(-)?,"
15 > > > > done
16 > > > >
17 > > > > echo "[${res%,}]"
18 > > > Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
19 > > > used
20 > > > since 2010?
21 > > >
22 > > You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
23 > > eclass
24 > > maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if
25 > > Ruby
26 > > project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
27 > >
28 > <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
29 > </sarcasm>*
30 >
31 > * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
32 >
33
34 Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
35 chatter?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz>