1 |
On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > > > --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
6 |
> > > > +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
7 |
> > > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() { |
8 |
> > > > local res= |
9 |
> > > > for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do |
10 |
> > > > has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \ |
11 |
> > > > - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
12 |
> > > > ntation}?," |
13 |
> > > > + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
14 |
> > > > ntation}(-)?," |
15 |
> > > > done |
16 |
> > > > |
17 |
> > > > echo "[${res%,}]" |
18 |
> > > Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer |
19 |
> > > used |
20 |
> > > since 2010? |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the |
23 |
> > eclass |
24 |
> > maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if |
25 |
> > Ruby |
26 |
> > project doesn't have some secret overlays using it. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! |
29 |
> </sarcasm>* |
30 |
> |
31 |
> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless |
35 |
chatter? |